I'm not a Pacifica fan myself (actually call them Pacifiers), but they are a solid built vehicle. They drive well. I just don't care for the looks of them.
From what I remember about my long gone 95 LHS, you were to inspect the belt at 60K miles and replace at 105K. This never made any sense to me. If you went to the trouble to inspect the darn thing, just replace it. While you're at it, be sure to replace the water pump and maybe the tensioner too!
I also never liked the Pacifica. Over weight, over priced, underpowered! I guess the market decided the Pacifica's fate. You don't drop something that's selling well! Just my $0.02.
FredB, the 4.0 Pacifica's are anything but underpowered. Now the 3.5 Pacifica's are not a sports car, but they can get out of their own way. But the 4.0 Pacificas... well they are just awesome.
The 4.0 is similar to the 3.5 as far as needing a belt.
The Pacifica wasn't my style either.
The funny thing is that the Journey doesn't look too bad to me. While they aren't the same car, they are of similar idea. (obviously the Pacifica was much more luxury oriented)
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Related Threads
?
?
?
?
?
The Chrysler Minivan Fan Club Forums
572K posts
80.4K members
Since 2003
ChryslerMinivan.net is the best forum for Chrysler Town and Country owners to discuss mileage, price, problems, towing and more. Join now!